Legal Walls

The question of ‘Legal Walls’

A question that is often asked and on many occasions tried, in an effort to reduce the amount of graffiti vandalism in an area and to provide an ‘outlet’ for the vandals to undertake their vandalism.

Many communities have tried ‘legal’ or ‘free walls,’ or areas that permit graffiti and found them ineffective. There are a couple of problems with ‘legal walls’ which we have listed below.

While well intentioned, legal walls often cause more harm than good, and tend to attract other graffiti vandalism in the surrounding areas of that ‘legal wall’. Legal walls also send mixed messages on the issue of graffiti vandalism.

Communities and governments that create or want to create a ‘legal’ wall should be ready to take responsibility for any number of adverse effects, and can also have liability and negligence issues.

The following are just a few areas to consider before allowing a ‘legal wall’ :
• Who will monitor the wall?
• Will it be repainted regularly to provide a fresh ‘canvas’?
• What if someone writes obscenities or hate graffiti on the wall? What action will be taken? And by who?
• What if graffiti moves to walls nearby and the surrounding area? Who will pay to remove it? Who will ensure the safety of those removing the graffiti? Can those who gave permission for graffiti on a ‘legal wall’ be held liable for attraction of other graffiti in the surrounding area?
• Who is allowed to use the ‘legal wall’? Will they be required to adhere to OH&S standards? If not, who is liable for any injuries or health issues that arise? How will any rules by enforced?
• Are there laws in place that restrict possession of graffiti implements by persons? Who will enforce these? Who will be responsible for person caught with implements that convene State laws?

These are questions that we all, in the community, need to be asking when discussing the idea of a ‘legal wall’ project.

Many people say that ‘legal walls’ don’t get tagged or graffitied once they are in place. This statement is actually wrong. Recently on the ABC TV Sunday Arts program (Sunday Feb 10 2008) two graffiti vandals admitted that they hated graffiti vandals that tagged or painted over their work. This shows that the so called Graffiti vandals code of ethics, where one does not paint over someone else’s vandalism, does not exist. There is also evidence across the country where ‘legal walls’ having been targeted by other vandals.

In some parts of the world people have been killed for painting over so called ‘legal walls’

There is little evidence to indicate that ‘legal walls’ deter graffiti vandalism as few audits have been undertaken before and after a ‘legal wall’ has been approved by that authority.

Other issues surrounding ‘legal walls’ include;
• A ‘legal wall’ sends a mixed message to the very audience a community should be educating about respect for other peoples property. Understanding that it is ok to ‘write’ on this wall, but not another, is a difficult concept for children and confusing to teens and young adults. They may believe that other surfaces covered with graffiti illegally are also ‘legal walls’.
• ‘Legal walls’ are often ‘learning walls’ for novice graffiti vandals who want to hone their skills or watch more proficient vandals at work. Once they have prefaced their tag, novice vandals want to try it in more visible areas of the community.
• Graffiti vandalism is not restricted to the legal wall and as such the rest of the community is affected.
• An increase in litter in and around the ‘legal wall’ begins to take place.
• Judgements on the type of the type of graffiti that will be permissible, and which are not, have to be made. What may seem like relatively harmless hip-hop and generic graffiti may be accompanied by offensive, or obscene hate graffiti, racial graffiti and gang graffiti.
• ‘Legal walls’ can be used as ‘recruiting areas’ for graffiti crews and even gangs.

Graffiti Hurts – Australia believes that any organisation thinking about or developing a ‘legal wall’ program or government agencies and local government providing funding for a project should adopt the Graffiti Hurts – Australia guidelines for Community Arts Murals.

These guidelines have been developed to ensure a wholelistic approach across the agency to ensure maximum participation, increase in community pride and a reduction in the spend by government agencies, local government and businesses on graffiti removal.

Graffiti Hurts-Australia is also in a position to manage the grant applications, program and local project for government agencies across Australia. Graffiti Hurts-Australia takes into account not only our guidelines, but all safety aspects and ensuring that the project becomes a true community asset. Contact the Graffiti Hurts-Australia office to find out how Graffiti Hurts – Australia can be your community partner for community murals.